Environmental Science Sensors Are Watching

Open Standards for Sustainability
By Steven Ramage | Published February 19, 2012

At several conferences in the last year I have heard people talk about the widespread use of mobile phones. Some speakers mentioned an approximate 4 billion phones in use worldwide while others stated it was more like 5 billion. So what does an extra billion mean anyway?

One of the ways of looking at your mobile phone is as a sensor. Smartphones typically include gyroscope, accelerometers, GPS, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, cell, sound, light, time, near-field communications (NFC), compass, and camera. This list will soon include thermometer and gravimeter. Applications using combinations of these sensors are already providing capabilities for navigation in general, and soon, indoor positioning. Tiny, inexpensive, geolocated, network-connected sensors like these are rapidly making their way into vehicles, buildings, pipes, ducts, bridges, stores, and factories.

Web-resident sensors (such as webcams) and ‘everyone-as-a-sensor’ are not new concepts, but the availability now of open sensor communication standards greatly multiplies the significance of such ideas. “Network effects” come into play, increasing the value of the sensors and the data they produce, opening up countless commercially feasible possibilities for new applications. Intuitively, it seems obvious that the network effects that helped create global telephony, the Internet and the Web can bring great benefits to environmental science and management.

Sensor Web Enablement

Every sensor has a location, and sensor location is usually important. For this reason, the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC), in cooperation with other standards organizations such as IEEE and the Worldwide Web Consortium (W3C), has undertaken the OGC Sensor Web Enablement (SWE) initiative.

SWE adds a real-time sensor dimension to the Internet and the Web. It also enables efficient access to stores of sensor observations. This has extraordinary significance for science, environmental monitoring, transportation management, agriculture, public safety, facility security, building energy management, the smart electrical grid, smart pipes, predictive maintenance, and other activities that underpin sustainability. See Figure 1 for an illustration of how SWE standards are used to integrate live data streams from multiple sensors to provide real-time brush fire monitoring.

We have far more environmental sensors and far more data than ever before, but their value overall has, arguably, increased only arithmetically, not exponentially, because they are largely isolated and unpublished, not online in ways that make them effectively discoverable, assessable, accessible and usable by many.

The Sensor Standards Ecosystem

Because location is a crosscutting issue that many other software standards development organizations (SDOs) must confront at some point, the OGC actively pursues cooperative relationships with other SDOs. This approach has been helpful in dealing with pre-existing sensor standards and sensor standards that have been independently emerging, such as...

 

The complete article is available in the Fall 2011 Digital Edition of LBx Journal.